skipToContent
FEDE
taameer logo

taameer

taameer

Egypt
verified

developer.verification

0

Projects

0

Launches

Contact

taameer

0

Reviews

Core Evaluation

Comprehensive assessment of developer's core competencies

Track Record

TAMEER describes itself as an Egyptian real estate developer with roots dating back to 1954, initially starting as a government-owned organization and later serving multiple generations of customers. Public materials list landmark developments including Masaken Sheraton (Heliopolis) with around 650 units developed in the early 1990s, and historic projects such as the Oberoi Hotel in Aswan referenced as developed in the early 1970s. The company also presents a broader “our developments/landmarks” portfolio and modern branded projects promoted through its channels. This supports a long operating history with both legacy landmark work and contemporary residential/community development activity.

Financial Credibility

TAMEER’s longevity (publicly stated since 1954) and continued operation with an internal team size referenced as 150+ across areas of the industry indicate sustained business activity, though this is not a direct measure of financial strength. The company provides a downloadable profile and maintains active official channels, but audited financials and external financing arrangements were not identified in reviewed sources. No credible public reports of insolvency or funding failure were found in the reviewed materials. Overall, financial credibility appears stable but should be rated conservatively due to limited public financial disclosure.

Project Quality

The publicly listed landmarks suggest experience delivering complex and high-visibility projects, including hospitality and large-scale housing components, which can indicate capability across asset types. Project descriptions emphasize planned communities and recognized landmarks, but independently verifiable technical quality audits and defect-rate data were not found in reviewed sources. As a result, quality assessment is based on the documented existence of landmark projects and continued project delivery claims rather than measured performance outcomes.

Legal & Regulatory Standing

TAMEER’s public materials indicate longstanding operation in Egypt and describe an origin as a government-owned organization, which can support baseline legitimacy claims. However, reviewed sources did not provide primary regulatory documentation (e.g., explicit licensing numbers or government approval records per project) that can be independently verified. No reputable public reports indicating regulatory sanctions or systemic non-compliance were identified in reviewed materials. Regulatory standing therefore appears acceptable based on longevity and public footprint, with limited primary-record verification in reviewed sources.

Customer Experience

Reviewed sources did not include a strong, independently verifiable dataset of buyer or resident reviews specific to TAMEER’s modern communities. The available information is primarily company-provided history and portfolio descriptions rather than post-handover service outcomes. As a result, customer experience cannot be reliably characterized as high or low from reviewed sources, and no consistent public pattern of severe dissatisfaction was evidenced in the materials reviewed.

Market Reputation

TAMEER is presented as a long-established Egyptian developer with a multi-decade history and a portfolio that includes recognized landmarks and neighborhood-scale housing efforts. Third-party developer profiles also reference its founding date and market positioning, supporting broader visibility. No major reputable negative press was identified in reviewed sources. Overall, market reputation appears established, anchored by longevity and publicly listed landmark work.

Innovation & Sustainability

Reviewed public sources did not provide verifiable sustainability certifications, quantified environmental targets, or formal ESG reporting for TAMEER’s projects. While the company references community creation and development over time, this is not sufficient to confirm sustainable building practices. Innovation and sustainability practices therefore remain not clearly evidenced in reviewed sources.