skipToContent
FEDE
royal development logo

royal development

royal development

Egypt
verified

developer.verification

0

Projects

0

Launches

Contact

royal development

0

Reviews

Core Evaluation

Comprehensive assessment of developer's core competencies

Track Record

Royal Developments (Egypt) is publicly associated with residential projects such as Monark in Mostakbal City and other marketed compounds appearing on Egyptian real-estate portals. Multiple sources describe the company as founded in 2007 (or having ~15–16+ years of experience), but these claims are largely presented via company-facing or brokerage/portal narratives rather than official filings. The most consistently referenced flagship is Monark (Mostakbal City), with other appearances such as Najm (New Cairo) in market listings. Overall, the public footprint indicates an active developer with at least one major, multi-phase community and additional marketed inventory, but the broader completed-project history is not strongly documented in authoritative sources.

Financial Credibility

Public sources emphasize sales activity and ongoing launches for the Monark project, indicating active market operations. However, no audited financials, public debt disclosures, or clearly verifiable institutional funding structures were identified in the reviewed sources. A company news post references achieving sales targets, but this is self-published and should be treated cautiously as an indicator rather than proof of financial strength. Overall, financial credibility can be described as “active in-market,” but not independently verified from strong financial documentation.

Project Quality

Public materials position Monark as a planned, amenity-rich community, but these are primarily promotional descriptions. Independent technical quality assessments or widely cited third-party construction audits were not found in the reviewed sources. Market listings indicate ongoing demand/visibility, but that does not directly validate build quality. As a result, project quality cannot be conclusively evaluated from the reviewed open sources beyond noting the project’s scope and continued marketing presence.

Legal & Regulatory Standing

No authoritative public registry documentation confirming licenses, permits, or governmental approvals was located in the reviewed sources. The developer’s projects are broadly marketed on major portals, which suggests some market-level compliance, but it is not a substitute for official approvals. No regulator enforcement actions or confirmed non-compliance events were surfaced in the reviewed results. Overall, regulatory standing is not fully verifiable from the reviewed open sources, with no confirmed negatives identified.

Customer Experience

Verified, systematic buyer satisfaction data was not found in the reviewed sources. Some community-group discussions mention Monark and Royal Developments, but these are informal and not reliable enough for a factual summary of service quality. The developer provides official contact channels and maintains an active public web presence, supporting basic accessibility. Overall, customer experience remains insufficiently documented in high-quality public sources.

Market Reputation

Royal Developments has visible market presence through Monark and related listings on major Egyptian real-estate portals. Public descriptions generally frame the developer as established (often citing a 2007 founding), but this is not corroborated by strong independent corporate documentation in the reviewed sources. No major, widely reported controversies were identified in the reviewed results. Market reputation from open sources appears “active and present,” but only partially supported by high-authority references.

Innovation & Sustainability

No independently verified sustainability certifications, green building standards, or formal ESG disclosures were found in the reviewed sources. Public materials focus on lifestyle planning and amenities rather than documented sustainability performance. Therefore, innovation/sustainability practices cannot be verified from open sources reviewed.