skipToContent
FEDE
Style home developments logo

Style home developments

Style home developments

Egypt
verified

developer.verification

0

Projects

0

Launches

Contact

Style home developments

0

Reviews

Core Evaluation

Comprehensive assessment of developer's core competencies

Track Record

Style Home Developments presents itself as an Egyptian real estate developer established in 2002, with early activity referenced in Tanta and later expansion into New Cairo. Public sources and the developer’s channels reference multiple named developments including The Icon Residence, The Icon Residence II, The Iconic Plaza, and The Icon Gardens. Independent real estate listing platforms also catalogue these projects and their market presence, indicating ongoing sales and community positioning. The overall footprint suggests a consistent pipeline of residential and mixed-use projects, though comprehensive audited delivery statistics are not publicly consolidated in the reviewed sources.

Financial Credibility

Public reporting indicates Style Home announced The Icon Gardens with reported investments exceeding EGP 1 billion, which suggests meaningful project capitalization, though underlying financing structure is not disclosed. The developer maintains an active official web presence and publishes project information and contact channels, which supports operational continuity but does not replace financial transparency. No public audited financial statements or lender disclosures were identified in reviewed sources. Overall financial credibility appears moderate based on sustained market activity and reported project investment, with conservative confidence due to limited primary financial disclosure.

Project Quality

Public descriptions of Style Home’s projects emphasize master-planned residential compounds with amenities and clustered layouts, as reflected in project pages and listing platforms. The Icon Gardens and Icon Residence II are presented with defined site areas, community planning elements, and facility sets, indicating standardized compound-style development. However, independently verifiable post-completion technical quality assessments (e.g., engineering defect reports, third-party construction audits) were not found in reviewed sources. Quality assessment is therefore based on the consistency of project typology and market listing presence rather than documented performance metrics.

Legal & Regulatory Standing

No authoritative public registry extracts or licensing confirmations were identified in reviewed sources that explicitly document regulatory approvals per project. Nonetheless, the projects are widely marketed on major platforms and the developer maintains an identifiable official website and contact footprint, supporting basic legitimacy indicators. In absence of primary governmental records in the reviewed sources, regulatory standing cannot be fully validated, but no reputable public reports of non-compliance were identified.

Customer Experience

Reviewed sources did not provide a strong set of independently verifiable buyer/tenant testimonials or aggregated review data suitable for a balanced satisfaction analysis. The available information primarily reflects project marketing pages and listing-platform descriptions rather than post-delivery service performance. As a result, customer experience can be described as not well-evidenced in the reviewed sources, with no clearly documented widespread satisfaction or dissatisfaction trend identified.

Market Reputation

Style Home is presented in public sources as an established developer with a multi-project presence, and it appears across widely used real estate platforms in Egypt. A business-news style report also covered the launch of The Icon Gardens, suggesting some media visibility in the sector. No reputable sources reviewed characterized the developer as controversial or high-risk, and no major negative press was identified. Overall, market perception appears as an active, mid-to-established player with documented project launches and listings.

Innovation & Sustainability

Reviewed public materials did not provide verifiable sustainability certifications or quantified green-building commitments for specific projects. While compounds are described with landscaping and community planning features, this is not sufficient to confirm sustainability standards (e.g., energy performance, certification). Innovation and sustainability practices are therefore not clearly evidenced in reviewed sources.